learn from its press, which decided to terminate the contract for the management of the RFU by the consortium entrusted to Gaia WADA.
What that leaves us baffled is your statement, which is passed as a huge benefit to the citizens, namely that increases in service will be paid by the Municipality.
That statement, which in his opinion would appease those who have signed a petition against the increases imposed by GAIA discriminated against, instead creates more concern.
Which funds will be transferred to the higher costs borne by the Municipality in respect of the AMA? what services will be cut? However, no responses
fundamental that the citizens of San Cesareo asked the petition organized by the Committee CLARA:
because there is no mention to 'recycling organization that would be an advantage economic and environmental terms for the city and citizens?
this fundamental issue we continue to remain vague and deeply set back from the experiences of other municipalities.
the eve of the election campaign, his councilor Mattogno was publicized with great fanfare the launch of a new season with the promotion of participatory budgeting. Finite
elections ever returned to a policy of self-referential, self-congratulatory and emphatic style Berlusconi's second worst.
We heed and take seriously our guidelines, evaded earlier by his predecessor Pera and now to her, despite repeated promises.
Convoke just business associations, social policies and to jointly proposals that lead to the reduction of municipal solid waste and the organization of the collection.
This certainly will not lead to change our bad review we have on his administration, but will show that, despite everything, some time ago and the interests of citizens.
left democraticacircolo San Cesareo
0 comments:
Post a Comment