Woman Breastfeed To Man

LETTER TO FRIENDS 'AND' THE RIDGE THE scum "

Naples, July 12, 2008 Dear


,
is with anger in my body that I am writing this letter from the low of Naples, the Health District in the heart this summer's fire. Mine is a lacerating anger because today is the lie becomes the truth. My lament is so well expressed by a jew believer in Psalm 12
"Just lie to each other is say
mouths full of lies, all
to hide what they plot in the heart. How
reptiles crawl, and the most vile
emerge
is at its peak the dregs. "
When, after Korogocho, I chose to live in Naples, I never thought that I would live the same struggles. I moved to Nairobi from the landfill, next to the slums of Naples Korogocho struggles against landfills and inceneritori.Sono convinced that Naples is just the tip of the iceberg of a problem that overwhelms us tutti.Infatti, if in this world more than six billion human beings lived like we live rich (11% of the world consumes 88% of the planet's resources!) we need four more planets as resources and other four as if to throw our garbage dumps. The poor of Korogocho, living on the landfill, they taught me to recycle everything, re-use everything, to fix everything, sell everything, but especially to live sober.
E 'was a great lesson that helps me today to review the situation of waste in Naples and Campania, the region reduced from twenty to sversatoio national waste tossici.Infatti members of the mafia in collusion with local politicians and Masonic lodges covered, had decided in 1989, the restaurant "La Taverna" Villaricca "to dump toxic waste in Campania.Questo it became increasingly difficult bury our waste in Somalia. Thousands of Tir came from every part of Italy and loads of toxic waste were buried by the mafia in the Triangle of Death (Acerra-Nola-Marigliano), in the Land of the fires (North Naples) and in the countryside of Caserta. These toxic waste "bomb" today, especially infants, with dioxins, nanoparticles that produce tumors, birth defects, leukemia ... ...
Biutiful Cauntri The documentary expresses well what I tell you.
A disaster which we must add the policy now subject to economic powers-finanziari.Infatti this region has been managed since 1994 by 10 Special Commissioners for waste from the various national governments that have followed. (It 's becoming increasingly clear to me, the interweaving of political, economic-financial potentates, Camorra, Masonic lodges and secret services covered!). In 15 years, the special commissioners have spent over two billion euro, to produce seven million tonnes of "eco-bales, which have nothing to echo: as it is waste, wrapped in plastic that can not be either incinerated (the Campania is already an environmental disaster!) or bury because it pollutes groundwater. Much of this eco-bales, stacked outside the town of Giugliano, infest with their leachate those great campaign called "Tavern of the king.
And so we came to disaster! Today Campania has reached the same levels of cancer of the Northeast, but it has factories and lavoro.Noi without factories and unemployed, we are doomed to waste the same sorte.Il Ours is not an ecological disaster, I say rage, but an ecological crime, the result of political decisions that cover huge financial interests. This is demonstrated by the fact that Prodi, a government expired, has signed two ordinances: one that allowed to burn ecoballe Giugliano Acerra incinerator, the 'other place which will allow the Cip 6 (the bill that we pay Enel for renewable energy) to the 3 incinerators in Campania that "turn the shit into gold-like Guido Viale says "How much more shit, the more gold!"
further anger when Berlusconi's government has signed the new decree n.90 waste in Campania. Berlusconi imposes on us, by military force, to build 10 four landfills and incinerators. If the 4 incinerator operation, Campania should import waste from elsewhere to make them funzionare.Da only the Acerra incinerator would burn 800,000 tonnes per year! It 'clear then that we do not want to separate their waste, because if it was done seriously (70%), there would be no need for those inceneritori.E' for 14 years that there is no political will to do the collection. Neapolitans are not who do not want, but the political obstacles that they have to obey the powerful economic and financial sponsors of the incinerators. And all this is imposed by military force prohibiting any dissent or resistance, under penalty of prigione.Le consequences of this decree for the region are devastating. "If all citizens have equal social dignity and are equal before the law (Article 3 of Constitution), the Campani will be less equal, have less social status-so says a recent appeal to MPs Campani What is described as "toxic" elsewhere, even on the basis of Community legislation, in Campania is not, what else is considered "dangerous "here does not will be. The rules of environmental protection and preservation and health control, there will be in place. The police and the judiciary with regard to prosecution of breaches of waste legislation, have fewer powers than in the rest of Italy and the new special courts for their immense expertise and innovation, will not be able to maintain, as happens elsewhere, the Campani's rights. "
Faced with all this, I have a right to be indignant. For me it is an ethical and moral. There must be a priest, as a missionary. If you fight against abortion and euthanasia, I must be in the fight to all this is a major threat to human health from Campania. The decree Berlusconi waste law the health of citizens Campani.
why I went with such outrage in the Acerra incinerator body, to challenge Berlusconi's press conference, held in the heart of the monster, as he calls people. We were few, perhaps a hundred people. (The people of Acerra, after the beating of 29 August 2004 by the police, are terrified and afraid to take the field). We tried to say no to what was our accadendo.Abbiamo flyers distributed to the press: "Democracy has died in Mourning cittadino.La Acerra.Ne give the sad news the president Berlusconi and Undersecretary Bertolaso." At the press conference (no was allowed to participate!) Berlusconi Fibe has apologized to all he has to "immediately" to build the incinerator in Acerra! (remember that the Fibe is on trial today!). A slap on the courts! Bertolaso \u200b\u200bannounced that it had signed the day before the ordinance because it would end with the Fibe work! Then she announced that she was chosen by private treaty, one of three or four Italian and foreign companies, to administer the Italian rifiuti.Quella will almost certainly the A2A (the multi-Brescia and Milan) and the foreign and Veolia, the largest multinational water and the second in the world to waste. Veolia will almost certainly be to eat up the treat, so after the waste is Papper even water Napoli.Che shame! E 'stravittoria of the economic-financial potentates, whose sole purpose is to make money in spite of all of us that we become the new guinea pigs. I am convinced that Campania has now become a prime example of what Naomi Klein in her book Shock Doctrine, called the economy of shock! There, where there is a major emergency economic-financial potentates allowed to do things they could not do under normal circumstances. If it works in Campania, it will be repeated elsewhere. (New Orleans after Katrina teaches!).
And for us to swallow this bitter pill, O 'system will send a thousand volunteers to help to make fools of Naples to separate into a thousand mountain to support the operation and three hundred psychologists oleare this! But at what point did we get in this country!?! I deeply outraged! And I proclaim my solidarity with these people killed! "Father Alex and his brothers" was written in a photograph that appeared in Time (inset of La Repubblica). Yes, I am proud to be in Naples at this time so bad with my brothers (and sisters) of Savignano Irpino, dispossessed of their land sown in November, with my brothers Chiaiano, forced to enter their homes with a pass because under military surveillance.
why, with the committees as waste Alarm toxic, with networks such as Lilliput and with so many groups continue to resist
in Campania. No wonder arrenderemo.Vi to share this anger, this rage against the economic and financial system that kills and kills not only the poor of the South, but also the poor in the heart of the empire. I find comfort in the words of the great resistance against Hitler, the Danish Lutheran pastor, Kaj Munk killed by the Nazis in 1944. "What then is the task of the preacher today? Should I answer: faith, hope and charity. It seems a better answer. But I would rather say: Courage. But no, even this is quite challenging to establish the whole truth ..... Our task today is recklessness .. Why what we lack is certainly not as a Church nor psychology nor letteratura.Quello that we lack is a holy anger. "Lying
Before the bell that rage in this region, we can do is a holy rage. An anger that I see in my fellow citizens, but also in my church. ". The symbols of the Christian Church have always been the lion, the lamb, the dove and the fish always said Kaj Munk-but never the chameleon."
I write this the return of the event held on the streets of Chiaiano, against 'military occupation of cava.Invece to wait for the technical assessment of the suitability of the quarry, Bertolaso \u200b\u200bhas sent the army to occupy it. The people of Chiaiano feels duped, betrayed and abandoned.
not forget us. It 'a matter of life or death for everyone. E 'with so much anger that you write it.
resist!

Alex Zanotelli

Jello 3d Editable Cell

Difficulties encountered in many areas of the Castle, including San Cesareo, in the delivery of water by the operator ACEA, highlighting the absurdity derived from political and economic decisions taken since the entry effect of ATO 2, making it even more urgent than the principles that the forces of the left have always said: that water is a public good and an inalienable right, with principles
materialized with the launch in March 2006 collecting signatures for the proposed law of popular initiative "Principles for the protection, the government and the public management of water and provisions for ripubblicizzazione water service."
Some elements are important to understand what's happening:
differently from what we can imagine, the ACEA is no longer a public company.
Since 1998, the date of its entry on the stock exchange is a company limited by shares. The City of Rome holds 51% of the shares, while among the other shares are owned by the Caltagirone Group and the multinational Suez.
About SUEZ, is to remember that the alliance with the ACEA takes place in 2002 and the Memorandum of Understanding of 12 November 2001 reads:
"nothing will make any public announcement or press release with respect to this Protocol or any of the acts and operations that constitute it running. " It 'was then clear that they prepared to handle the huge deal since the introduction of legislation by the breakdown in law Galli reservoirs. The expectations of the basin
ACEA ATO 2 will be strangely with a direct award, without competition.
At the signing of the management agreement ACEA to the 108 municipalities of the province, it is granted the right to possess the 0.000003% of the capital, amounting to an action, by which the municipalities are deprived of every possible decision in the management of water services in their city.
Not only that, but users are also expropriated the right to information about decisions that affect them.
Article 12 of the Convention, it states that the parties, municipalities and ACEA therefore, must maintain the confidentiality of all documents, news and information about the other party of which they have acquired during the sottoscizione or during the Pact its implementation. The same confidentiality must be maintained on the occasion of taking part in ACEA ATO 2. That is to say, not only the municipalities do not count any more, but are not obligated to provide any information to their citizens. We are
investment: these are divided to 35% in favor of the municipalities and 65% for the City of Rome.
the face of increased investment on Rome, this offers the lowest rates compared to the Province.
What are the real reasons of water scarcity in our territories? Surely abbasssamento
of the aquifer to the excess of human settlement is a serious problem to be addressed, as this, including increasing the percentage of arsenic in the water.
only question is: are there other reasons that there are hidden? Investment was enough in the province? to apply emergency water, can not also be a way to justify the contracts, instead of issuing public?
The municipalities concerned must take note of this absurd situation, together we open to institutions, individuals and committees
a general dispute over the water with ACEA, claim the right to information and transparency on the management of the primary good of every citizen struggle to return to public management of water.

Daniel Baccarini
of the Federal Committee of the Democratic Left Castellidi

Can U Overdose On Zopiclone

Ethics and territorial government

The excerpt of a recent contribution posted on the No. 3 / 2008 of the magazine 'The Italian Administration':

Part of the latest economic and sociological literature [1] has emphasized the problems people created by the perverse effects in terms of further environmental degradation, and welfare, which may be associated with individual-level behaviors that are followed because they were considered by rational people, when they live in degraded or environmental contexts in urban areas where experience a high level of social risk.
This type of behavior by individuals is defined [2] as behavior that in such a context could help to increase personal well-being of the individual subject and at an aggregated level and comprehensive income, therefore, would have a negative impact on overall level of well-being of the community. This happens
because such activity would, in fact, a vicious spiral that makes you feel its negative effects on the same individual consumers who are encouraged to make use of certain goods or services to find on the market to try to blunt any negative effects on the quality of life caused by poor environmental conditions or the situation of unsafe cities.
use of such goods or services, it is argued [3] , would result in fact a further increase in the levels of environmental degradation and economic growth so defined, completely shareability, "undesirable" by specific studies on the subject.
As a result, it was said that economic growth would, in the short term, a weakening of the welfare levels of the community in terms of further environmental degradation.
In particular, the consumption of these goods would lead to negative economic effects imposed on populations and those that should be at the expense of the integrity of natural systems:
· water purifiers or air;
· mineral waters, which
· Tools help to protect people from hearing damage caused by urban traffic;
· medicines you are taking for the treatment of diseases caused by pollution of the atmosphere.
The list could be added all those individual and social problems that aggravate the conditions of existence of a significant number of people who, for different reasons, and not only cheap, they do not feel the need to peacefully coexist with the adverse effects of the destruction irreversible environmental (and, for example, the case of inconvenience to the court cases brought by the individual or interest groups affected by the situation of decay - such lawsuits are increasingly consuming, expensive and uncertain outcome - and this is the case with prejudice , that could be called a moral-existential, that people suffer when there is the inability to restore the state that many of the places for part of their existence they have known integrity, pleasant and healthy.
individuals, it is argued [4] , massive apply measures of self protection when living in areas affected by the cement and other forms of environmental depletion.
The degradation of the coast not far from large urban centers "can not justify expensive trips to areas contaminated by car or boat, or the purchase of vacation packages in some tropical paradise. To take advantage of assets that were previously available for free, individuals are forced to bear the costs " [5] .
Even more serious, however, is the circumstance in which those who is unable to bear these additional costs be affected directly, without in any way they can avoid the negative effects that result to all those who are not in a position to be able to enjoy an environment free of non-compromise in their leisure time and their holidays .
E 'hardly necessary to point out that these negative effects are caused by reasons of non-exclusively economic but also psychological, moral, medical, social, etc. ..
seems to say in short, is unlikely to be contradicted, that the continued implementation of "self-protective choices" [6] (due to human behavior, however, largely conscious, determine not only the depletion of natural heritage that should be available to all, but a logical consequence, the weakening of the security situation in the contemporary world) by the individual (which still does not seem sufficiently aware of the organizations that should address these issues) is at least partly the result of a purely hedonistic attitude.
We feel we should recall, to this point, the utilitarian theory of Jeremy Bentham, in which little importance is given to the sympathy and the importance of conscience, duty, justice and kindness towards others [7] .
Luigino Bruni argued that ' "Everyone, at least in the version of Bentham, is seen as a machine that maximizes utility, where utility is deeply rooted in a philosophy of hedonistic (pleasure) [...]. The happiness of Bentham can then be called psychological hedonism, individualism and a kind " [8] .
And this, in fact, it is: use a strongly individualistic and hedonistic, if not purely economic profit of the common resources, which is committed to the detriment of the natural heritage of course, what in fact has nothing to do with ' have environmental consciousness, sense of duty, kindness to others. The expression
"Undesirable economic growth" is thus presented as entirely consistent with the growing awareness today about the importance that environmental factors on the welfare of people.

* [1] It makes particular reference to the authors here, particularly sociologists, who are busy or dealing with hazardous conditions in which modern society is exposed, Ulrick Beck, Anthony Giddens, and others. Squidoo also an interesting article called several times during the course of this paper, Angelo Antoci, "Environmental degradation and economic growth undesirable" appeared on the No. 7, LXXX Year of The Bridge, July 2007, pp.54-65
[2] See A. Antoci, "Environmental degradation ..., op.cit. p.54
[3] See A. Antoci, "Environmental degradation ..., op.cit. p.54

[4] See A. Antoci, "Environmental degradation ..., op.cit. p.55
[5] Ibid
[6] Ibid
[7] See L. Bruni, economy, happiness, and others - a survey on goods and welfare, Rome 2004, p.133
[8] See L. Bruni, economics, happiness and the others ..., op.cit., P.154

*

John Graziano missing